Turning the Focus to Fathers: Broadening Our Understanding of How Fathers Influence Child Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quality of parent-child interactions is one of the most robust predictors of childhood outcomes, with effects extending into the adolescence and adulthood period. Most of the research examining parent-child interactions has come from the investigation of mother-child dyads. Due to the recent societal shift wherein fathers have greater involvement and responsibility in child upbringing, it is essential to deepen our understanding of how fathers affect family processes and children’s development. The aim of the current dissertation was to examine the role that fathers play in children’s development across various domains and developmental stages. Sensitive parenting has been shown to be one of the strongest predictors of children’s well-being across various developmental domains. Although individual studies have revealed positive associations between paternal sensitivity and children’s well-being, no meta-analysis has been conducted to synthesize this literature. In Study One, six independent meta-analyses (N=60 samples) were conducted. Results showed that children raised with sensitive fathers displayed better cognitive (e.g., language, executive function) and socioemotional (e.g., emotion regulation) outcomes. In Study Two, father-child conflict interactions were investigated. Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling was used to disentangle individual contributions from interpersonal influences during father-child conflict resolution discussions with younger (ages 5-9, N=150) and older (ages 7-13, N=152) children. Children influenced fathers’ conflict constructiveness under certain conditions, with evidence for developmental differences in the magnitude and directions of influence, while fathers were not found to influence their children’s conflict constructiveness under any circumstance. In Study Three, the important role of fathers’ childhood conduct problems on parenting and children’s functioning was examined. A cross-sectional multilevel mediation model was used (N= 198 families; 452 children) to assess whether father conduct problems relate to child disruptive behaviour via paternal negativity to result in greater sibling similarity or variability in disruptive behaviour. Paternal negativity did not significantly (although marginal) mediate the association between paternal history of conduct problems and within-family variability in child disruptive behaviour. Using rigorous methodological and analytical techniques, findings from this dissertation suggest that fathers play an important role in children’s socioemotional, behavioural, and cognitive development in the early and middle childhood periods. Implications are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".