MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133006322

Installation behaviour of ASTM F1852 twist-off type tension control bolts

2004· dissertation· W7133006322 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsTorqueThread (computing)LubricationNutAnchor boltTension (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In current RCSC Specification, ASTM F1852 twist-off tension-control bolt assemblies are directly recognized and twist-off-type tension-control bolt pretensioning is considered as one of the four bolt pretensioning methods. Twist-off tension-control bolt is characterized by the splined end which will be sheared off at a circular notch (torque control groove) when the required pretension is reached. Twist-off tension-control pretensioning is in fact based on torque control. Factors that affect the pretension of twist-of bolts are the bolt material strength, geometric properties of the bolts, thread conditions, lubrication conditions at the bolt and nut threads as well as the washer. A series of test programmes were performed to examine the influence of lubricants on installation, including time delays, weather conditions at time of installation, as well as the effects of other parameters on the bolt pretension. In addition, reinstallations of removed twist-off tension-control bolts with turn-of-nut pretensioning method were also investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it