MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133006322

Installation behaviour of ASTM F1852 twist-off type tension control bolts

2004· dissertation· W7133006322 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Weiyan Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsTorqueThread (computing)LubricationNutAnchor boltTension (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In current RCSC Specification, ASTM F1852 twist-off tension-control bolt assemblies are directly recognized and twist-off-type tension-control bolt pretensioning is considered as one of the four bolt pretensioning methods. Twist-off tension-control bolt is characterized by the splined end which will be sheared off at a circular notch (torque control groove) when the required pretension is reached. Twist-off tension-control pretensioning is in fact based on torque control. Factors that affect the pretension of twist-of bolts are the bolt material strength, geometric properties of the bolts, thread conditions, lubrication conditions at the bolt and nut threads as well as the washer. A series of test programmes were performed to examine the influence of lubricants on installation, including time delays, weather conditions at time of installation, as well as the effects of other parameters on the bolt pretension. In addition, reinstallations of removed twist-off tension-control bolts with turn-of-nut pretensioning method were also investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicEngineering Structural Analysis MethodsFrench-language works237,207