MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133007349

“Thinking Outside the Box”: A Snapshot of Child and Adolescent Therapists’ Early Experiences Adapting Services to the COVID-19 Context

2022· dissertation· W7133007349 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jessica Alexandra Carmichael

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsEmployment and Social Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpathyFeelingMental healthPhoneInterpretative phenomenological analysisContext (archaeology)Health professionalsSnapshot (computer storage)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19 has had numerous impacts on the general population, including increased physical health risks, social isolation, and prolonged uncertainty (Gruber et al., 2020). Some have argued these impacts disproportionately affect younger populations (Powell et al., 2020). Within Canada, there has been a sharp uprise in children/youth accessing the Kids Help Phone over the past 18 months (Watson, 2020), underscoring the importance of continued access to mental health supports for this population. Child/youth practitioners have faced the arduous task of transitioning their services online, which may be uniquely challenging to accomplish with younger clients. This study employed a mixed-methods concurrent embedded design to explore the experiences of 36 child/youth therapists in Ontario as they have navigated this new professional landscape. An interpretative phenomenological analysis revealed both negative and positive impacts of COVID-19. Therapists reported feelings of reduced self-efficacy, difficulties engaging with and interpreting nonverbal communication using virtual mediums, technological challenges, and personal challenges relative to balancing work/home commitments as primary challenges. Younger clients appeared most significantly impacted due to developmental challenges inherent in online engagement. In response, therapists described creatively adapting their services, relying on team members or others for support and/or consultation, and various self-care strategies. Positively, many therapists felt youth were benefitting from the increased accessibility of virtual services. Despite the challenges identified, a repeated-measures MANOVA revealed no significant changes to therapist self-reported state empathy levels when reflecting on challenging clinical interactions prior to and since the onset of COVID-19. Implications for future research and clinical practice are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicDigital Mental Health Interventions→French-language works237,207→