MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133011048

The limitations of ethnic humour: can ethnic humour function as an anti-racist discourse?

2004· dissertation· W7133011048 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lida Pahuta

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicHumor Studies and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComedyEthnic groupComicsEntertainmentMetaphorFunction (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines in what ways, if any, the use of ethnic humour can be used to promote anti-racist discourse. Presently, in Canada, ethnic humour is "in". As a result, comedians of minority backgrounds are being recognized and celebrated in the entertainment industry and, particularly, in comedy clubs. Among other comedians, East Indian-Canadian comic Russell Peters has articulated that he uses his comedy to draw out and break down the stereotypes that exist within our society. However, given the aggressive and unstable nature of stand-up comedy and the way its role and the role of comedians in Canadian society are positioned via the media and the war metaphor used to discuss it, it will become evident that a complex site such as a comic's stage is not as conducive to anti-racist work as many seem to believe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicHumor Studies and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207