MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133018884

APOE genotype and concussion in varsity athletes: Can genetics predict brain injury

2007· dissertation· W7133018884 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Vicki Leigh Kristman

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2007
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoOntario Neurotrauma Foundation
KeywordsConcussionApolipoprotein EAthletesCohortHazard ratioProspective cohort studyAlleleCohort studyConfidence interval
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concussion is a common sport-related injury and it is hypothesized that an epsilon-4 allele in the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE egr;4) may increase concussion susceptibility. Understanding the association between APOE egr;4 and concussion may be useful for targeting prevention strategies to APOE egr;4 carriers. The association between the presence of an APOE egr;4 allele in the APOE genotype and the incidence of concussion was studied in a prospective cohort study conducted from September 2002 to April 2006. Participants included University of Toronto varsity athletes participating in sports deemed high risk for concussion. Full informed consent was volunteered from 318 athletes with no concussion in the two years prior. Collected blood samples were genotyped and the presence of APOE egr;4 was described dichotomously. There was no loss to follow-up. Full informed consent involved agreement not to receive individual genetic results. A framework was developed using ethical principles to assist in the decision not to disclose individual genetic information to participants. The main outcome measure in the cohort study was time-to-concussion. It was measured two ways: athletic-exposures (number of games and practices) and number of games played. Only the first concussion sustained by an individual was included in the analysis. Sport-medicine professionals present on the sidelines identified the concussions. To assess misclassification, athletes self-reported if they incurred a concussion missed by the sport-medicine professional. The unadjusted hazard for concussion was 18% greater in APOE egr;4 carriers than in those without the APOE egr;4 allele (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.18 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52, 2.69)). Adjustment for sex, weight, height, and team type resulted in a HR of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.41, 2.72) indicating little effect from confounding factors. The HR including the self-reported concussions was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.50, 1.85) for the unadjusted HR and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.38, 1.73) for the adjusted HR. The number of games exposure measure produced similar results. In conclusion, no evidence for an association between the presence of an APOE egr;4 allele in the APOE genotype and the incidence of concussion was found. At this time, we do not recommend pre-season genetic testing for varsity athletes as a mechanism for targeting prevention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→