MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133021339

Developing a NITROglycerin Dose Titration Decision Support System (NITRO DSS)

2024· dissertation· W7133021339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Navpreet Kamboj

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsNitroglycerin (drug)Blood pressureClinical decision support systemDecision support systemAnginaClinical Practice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Angina is one of the most common reasons people visit Canadian emergency departments, with approximately 800,000 annual visits. Nitroglycerin is a first-line medication for the acute relief of angina. There is no standardized dose of intravenous nitroglycerin because its impact on blood pressure varies significantly among patients. Trained critical and coronary care nurses manually increase or decrease the dose to achieve optimal titration, defined as obtaining the intended therapeutic effect (relief of angina) while avoiding side effects associated with nitroglycerin. Nurses use their clinical judgment and past experiences to inform their clinical decision-making about nitroglycerin dose titration. Many nurses have trouble selecting the right dose and anticipating the patient’s response to the dose adjustment, leading to suboptimal titration of nitroglycerin. Clinical decision support systems have been shown to support nurses’ titration-based decision-making for other medications in critical care. However, a system for nitroglycerin titration currently does not exist. A decision support system designed for the titration of nitroglycerin infusions would facilitate the prediction of blood pressure responses consequent to potential adjustments in dosage. This system, when integrated with the clinical judgment and experiential knowledge of nursing professionals, would enhance the precision and effectiveness of nitroglycerin titration. Objectives. To develop a Nitroglycerin Dose Titration Decision Support System (nitro DSS) that provides blood pressure predictions following a nitroglycerin dose change. Design. A multi-method design with quantitative and qualitative methods was used to develop the clinical decision support system for nitroglycerin dose titration. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare blood pressure measured using a continuous non-invasive and invasive arterial pressure device in adult patients admitted to a critical care setting (Study One). This was followed by a retrospective observational design study to predict the subsequent systolic blood pressure following dose titration (defined as any change in the dose of nitroglycerin) within a 30-minute window (Study Two). The accuracy of a linear model, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, ridge regression, and a stacked ensemble model trained using the Auto Gluon-Tabular framework were investigated. A persistence model, where the future value in a time series is predicted as equal to its preceding value, was used as the baseline comparison for model accuracy. The nitro DSS interface (visual display) was designed using a user-centred approach consisting of two phases (Study Three). The first phase was a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews to identify design specifications for the visual display of nitro DSS. The second phase was three iterative rounds of usability testing to test and refine the prototype. In each round of testing, participants completed two questionnaires: the System Usability Scale (to measure usability) and the Ottawa Acceptability of Decision Rules Instrument (to measure acceptability). Results. The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed substantial differences between blood pressure measurements obtained from continuous non-invasive and invasive monitoring devices. Given the critical differences, continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring is not a reliable replacement for invasive monitoring in adult patients requiring critical care. As a result, continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring is unsuitable for developing a clinical decision support system that aims to incorporate predictions of blood pressure. Therefore, available electronic health record data was used to train machine learning models to predict blood pressure responses to nitroglycerin titrations. The results of study two identified the stacked ensemble model developed using the AutoGluon-Tabular framework to have the lowest root-mean-square error of all models, producing a 22% improvement against the baseline (a persistence model). The results of phase one of the user-centered design revealed four themes for the interface design: (1) Clear and Consistent, (2) Vigilant, (3) Interoperable, and (4) Reliable. Nurses suggested the initial and subsequent prototype versions incorporate features reflecting the four identified themes. The findings from study one informed the development of an initial prototype, which underwent three iterative rounds of usability testing in phase two. Nurses tested the prototype and provided feedback to improve its usability and acceptability. All study participants' ratings on usability and acceptability exceeded the minimum threshold. Conclusion. This thesis successfully applied a multi-method design to develop nitro DSS, a clinical decision support system that predicts blood pressure responses to a potential nitroglycerin dose change. Upon completion of three rounds of usability testing, a refined nitro DSS prototype was identified which demonstrated excellent usability and acceptability as defined in the System Usability Scale and the Ottawa Acceptability of Decision Rules Instrument, respectively. Subsequent research includes developing a high-fidelity prototype, testing nitro DSS in silent trials, and conducting a randomized control trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.408 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicElectronic Health Records Systems→French-language works237,207→