MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133021723

Acoustic Assessment of Sleep Apnea and Pharyngeal Airway

2021· dissertation· W7133021723 on OpenAlexaff
Shumit Saha

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsVector Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep apneaPolysomnographyAirwaySleep (system call)BreathingObstructive sleep apneaApneaRespiratory sounds
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep apnea is a chronic respiratory disorder that is characterized by recurrent reductions in breathing during sleep. The gold standard diagnosis of sleep apnea is an overnight sleep study with polysomnography (PSG), which is expensive and time-consuming. Furthermore, questionnaires are used for screening of sleep apnea during wakefulness, but they are highly subjective and do not provide the assessment of pharyngeal airway anatomy. This thesis presents acoustic technologies to diagnose sleep apnea during sleep and to assess the pharyngeal airway dimension during wakefulness. To diagnose sleep apnea during sleep, we recruited 69 individuals who underwent full-night PSG in the sleep laboratory. Simultaneously with PSG, we recorded the tracheal breathing sounds and respiratory-related movements with a microphone and an accelerometer, respectively. We developed a novel machine-learning algorithm utilizing random forest and logistic regression; and achieved 90% accuracy in detecting sleep apnea. We also identified each respiratory event with over 80% accuracy in patients with severe sleep apnea. Furthermore, we utilized deep convolutional networks to use breathing sounds and distinguish the two major sleep apnea types, obstructive and central events, with 84% accuracy. These algorithms can be used in a wearable device for monitoring sleep apnea. To assess the pharyngeal airway during wakefulness, we investigated vowel articulation and acoustic features of vowel sounds. To measure the pharyngeal airway effectively during vowel articulation, we used ultrasonography. We have shown that ultrasonography can be effectively used to measure the dimensions of the pharyngeal airway and the dimensions are different between individuals with and without sleep apnea. Furthermore, we have shown that patients with sleep apnea have had less variation in the pharyngeal airway dimension, which can be interpreted as less tongue movement than control groups while articulating vowels. Moreover, we have shown that the vowel sound features can estimate the pharyngeal airway dimension with high accuracy. These algorithms can be used for developing a vowel-based assessment of sleep apnea. Overall, the results of these studies showed the promise of breathing and vowel sounds to assess the pharyngeal airway and monitor sleep apnea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research→French-language works237,207→