MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133022086

Evaluation of Peracetic Acid Treatment for Reducing Disinfection By-product Formation in Drinking Water

2022· dissertation· W7133022086 on OpenAlexaffabout
Subhajit Mondal

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeracetic acidHydrogen peroxideWater treatmentRaw waterHuman decontaminationChlorineWater disinfectionReactivity (psychology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prechlorination is a widely adopted mussel control strategy by water treatment utilities. Although prechlorination is effective and inexpensive, it leads to disinfection by-product (DBP) formation. Peracetic acid (PAA), which exists in equilibrium with hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), is a promising alternative to prechlorination for mussel control. At the same time, PAA may also destroy DBP precursors, thereby serving two concurrent roles in drinking water treatment. This research explored the ability of PAA pre-oxidation to reduce subsequent chlorination DBPs (THMs, HAAs, and AOX). The results showed that a 5 mg/L PAA dose (containing about 10% H₂O₂ by mass) decreased DBP formation potential by up to 40% in raw water (pH:7.8-8.2, temperature:22-24 °C) collected from three Ontario utilities. The findings also indicate that H₂O₂ is more effective than PAA for reducing DBPs on a per mass basis. However, the poorer reactivity of PAA is compensated by its higher concentration in the PAA/H₂O₂ mixture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207