Bioanalytical Approaches to Investigate Antioxidant Molecules and Nucleic Acid-Protein Interactions in Alzheimer's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, responsible for 60-80% of all diagnoses. Herein, we reviewed AD, concentrating on the five main factors that influence its onset (Chapter 1). Then, we introduced biosensors, reviewing the fundamentals of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and electroanalytical techniques (Chapter 2). Next, we investigated the antioxidant activity of polyphenols and repurposed therapeutics (RPTs) for potential agents to combat oxidative stress associated with AD (Chapter 3). We then shifted our attention to investigate the ApoE4-SirT1 oligonucleotide interaction. Using electroanalytical techniques (Chapter 4) and SPR (Chapter 5), we showed that ApoE4 interacted with ssDNA but not dsDNA corresponding to the SirT1-promoter sequence. Furthermore, we showed the interaction with ssDNA was isoform specific amongst the ApoE isoforms. At present, we cannot comment on the biological implications of such an interaction, however, our findings have identified a possible ApoE4 aptamer with potential applications in biosensor technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".