MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133025201

Victimization and bullying in children with attention-deficit

2003· dissertation· W7133025201 on OpenAlexaff
Meghan Katherine Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsBibliographical Society of CanadaCNIB Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttributionAggressionHuman factors and ergonomicsPoison controlInjury preventionVerbal abusePeer victimizationSuicide prevention
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explored the occurrence of victimization and bullying among 9–14 year old children with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The relationship between attributional style, victimization and bullying was also explored by having children complete self-report measures. Parents and teachers provided ratings of bullying behaviour. Children with ADHD reported higher overall levels of victimization and equivalent levels of bullying behaviour as children without the disorder. Children with ADHD were also categorized as victims, bullies, and provocative victims significantly more often and reported higher levels of verbal, relational and physical aggression than comparison children. Verbal aggression was experienced more often than relational and physical aggression. When examining children's attributional styles for negative social outcomes, attributions to task difficulty accounted for the most variance in self-reported victimization and attributions to own personal qualities accounted for the most variance in self-reported bullying for children with and without ADHD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder→French-language works237,207→