Análisis socioeconómico y evaluación de la demanda de recurso hídrico en la cuenca media del rio Pamplonita del departamento Norte de Santander
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se realizaron análisis de la información existente en la corporación con relación al tramo en estudio, específicamente lo consignado en el Plan de Ordenamiento de cuencas hidrográficas del rio Pamplonita. Igualmente, se evaluó la demanda del recurso hídrico en el tramo correspondiente desde la desembocadura de la quebrada Iscalá hasta el puente San Rafael en la ciudad de Cúcuta, identificando los vertimientos existentes en el correspondiente desde la desembocadura de la quebrada Iscalá hasta el puente San Rafael en la ciudad de Cúcuta. Por ultimo, se desarrollaron encuestas con el fin de evaluar los diferentes usos del agua en el tramo de estudio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it