MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133029188

Predicting Oxygen Transport Properties of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Gas Diffusion Layers with Local Saturation Considerations: A Pore Network Modelling Approach

2022· dissertation· W7133029188 on OpenAlexaff
Raymond Guan

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxygen transportElectrolyteProton exchange membrane fuel cellSaturation (graph theory)OxygenGaseous diffusionFuel cellsSubstrate (aquarium)Diffusion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells are a promising means of reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. However, mass transport losses hinder the performance of PEM fuel cells, impeding their commercialization. This thesis comprises of two studies that determine the impact of liquid water within the substrate on the oxygen transport behaviour of the fuel cell. First, the impact of channel and land region saturation on the oxygen transport properties of the substrate were determined. The oxygen transport properties of the substrate were severely affected by channel region saturation, while land region saturation had a relatively minor impact. Next, the contribution of the substrate to the oxygen transport resistance of a PEM fuel cell was determined. It was determined that significant oxygen transport resistance arises from the catalyst layer (CL) or CL-microporous layer interface. This thesis offers insight into designing next-generation components for improved PEM fuel cell performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→