Calvin on Romans 6:1-8:14: The Function of Law and Grace in Calvin's Doctrine of Sanctification through Union with Christ and Its Implication for Wesleyan Theology of Sanctification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis argues that sanctification in Calvin’s thought is driven by the dialectic of freedom and obedience, which is linked with our mortification and vivification within our union with Christ. The thesis uses Calvin as a resource for reframing the Wesleyan doctrine of entire sanctification. It is argued that the Wesleyan doctrine is driven by moral perfectionism because (1) it conceptualizes the Christian life as a state of perfection in which all sins (including original sin) are eradicated, and (2) it does not explicitly address our sanctification within our union with Christ. Calvin noted correctly that sanctification is continuous in this life, and it should be conceived as our participation in Christ, in whom we are daily being mortified and vivified by Him. Calvin can help steer the Wesleyan doctrine away from moral perfectionism by challenging it to reframe sanctification as a continual participation in Christ in this life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".