MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133032650

An Eco-Theology to Inform the Relief and Development Work of the Primate's World Relief and Development Fund

2012· dissertation· en· W7133032650 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laura Marie Piotrowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Agency (philosophy)Relief WorkPoor reliefInternational developmentDevelopment aid
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Primate’s World Relief and Development Fund (PWRDF) is the international development and relief agency of the Anglican Church of Canada. There are increasing expectations that relief and development work will be aligned with efforts to promote environmental sustainability. Resituating the principles that guide the work of the PWRDF within an eco-theological framework will not only provide a stronger theological rationale for the work of the PWRDF but will also link its relief and development work with efforts to promote environmental sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.023
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicReligion, Ecology, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207