MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133033470

A search for the mechanisms by which various iron levels modulate elastin production

2004· dissertation· W7133033470 on OpenAlexaff
Severa Bunda

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsOffice of the Privacy Commissioner of CanadaLibrary and Archives Canada
FundersKela
KeywordsElastinIntracellularTropoelastinWestern blotElastic fiberNorthern blot
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Northern blot and real time RT-PCR analysis revealed that treatment with 20 muM iron led to sim;3-fold increase in elastin mRNA levels, while treatment with 200 muM iron decreased elastin message stability and subsequent mRNA levels. It has been implicated that iron imbalance is responsible for the elastic fiber defects in hereditary hemolytic disorders, and since the expression of several ECM is iron dependent, we speculated that iron might also modulate elastin gene expression. We conclude that a balance between these two iron-dependent mechanisms may constitute a novel factor regulating normal elastogenesis and that disturbance of this balance results in impaired elastic fiber production. The results of our immunocytochemical and metabolic studies assessing deposition of insoluble elastin, showed that treatment of cultured fibroblasts with 2--20 muM of iron (supplied as ferric ammonium citrate) induced an increase in elastin production, while treatment with 100--200-muM iron lead to intracellular reactive oxygen species generation, and a decrease in elastin production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207