MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133034583

Sky as Heaven, but Temporary Abode, as in Buddhianscience

2023· article· en· W7133034583 on OpenAlexaff
Bhikkhu Mihita

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsTD Bank Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkyNight skyPoint (geometry)Presentation (obstetrics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper shows, first, how in the Buddhianscientificliterature, the sky comes to be the Heaven, but only as a temporary abode. Just as the earth is the home for not only Humans but Animals, too, each with six senses, and hence Sentient-beings, the Sky-Heaven comes to be home for another type of sentient being, namely the Devas, also constituted of senses. The paper posits each of them to be phenotypes under the genotype satto ‘sentient being’. Buddhianscience outlines four sky spheric levels, the spiritual level ofagiven Earth-being at the point of death determining in which of the four one wouldend up in. Intriguingly, in Westernscience,too, the sky sphere comes to be classified in terms of 4-5levels, by physical height and other characteristic features. The highest level in both analyses ironically comes to be called the ‘exosphere’. This then is a peek – a brief presentation arguing for the view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicIndian and Buddhist StudiesFrench-language works237,207