Childhood Academic and Social Outcomes as a Function of Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (CDS): Examining the Mediating Role of the Instructional Context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (CDS), previously known as Sluggish Cognitive Tempo, is defined by symptoms of lethargy, slow behaviour and thinking, daydreaming, zoning out, and mental confusion. Research has shown that CDS is an independent syndrome, separable from other known diagnoses, that predicts functional impairment across various domains in childhood. Less is known regarding the mediating pathways connecting CDS symptoms to specific child outcomes. The objective of this dissertation was to test the role of the classroom instructional context in potentially accounting for the relationship between childhood CDS symptoms and both academic and social functioning. Participants included 154 children (Mage = 6.87 years; 49% female) enrolled in a school-based research project during the spring of Grade 1. The first study tested the hypothesis that lower student-teacher relationship quality would mediate the negative relationship between CDS symptoms and academic engagement. The results indicated that decreased student-teacher relationship quality partly accounted for the negative relationship between CDS symptoms and teacher-ratings of student behavioural and emotional engagement; however, the mediation model was not supported when child-rated engagement served as the outcome. The second study investigated whether lower teacher autonomy support would mediate the negative relationship between CDS symptoms and achievement outcomes. In support of our hypotheses, CDS symptoms had a negative indirect effect on academic performance, as well as on word-level decoding accuracy and fluency via decreased teacher-rated provision of autonomy support; however, teacher autonomy support did not mediate the association between CDS and math computation. The third study evaluated the prediction that lower teacher involvement and child prosocial behaviour would mediate the positive relationship between CDS symptoms and peer problems. The results showed that CDS had a positive indirect effect on peer problems via decreased teacher involvement, but not via prosocial behaviour. Overall, the findings indicate that early differences in instructional support related to CDS symptoms seem to contribute to associated academic and social outcomes. Highlighting that instruction is embedded within a social context, the studies suggest that efforts to enhance the student-teacher relationship, foster student autonomy, and provide dependable and informed teacher support may improve the well-being of children with CDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".