MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133040930

Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Renewable Jet Fuels Produced in Canada

2023· dissertation· W7133040930 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jon Albert Obnamia

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicBiodiesel Production and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorn stoverGreenhouse gasLife-cycle assessmentRenewable energyJet fuelBiofuelBiomass (ecology)Fossil fuel
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern technology has enabled the transformation of renewable biomass and waste into renewable energy for the sectors of our society that use fossil fuels the most. This thesis contributes to knowledge on renewable jet fuels (RJF) and their potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction benefits for the aviation sector from a Canadian context. The first part of this thesis quantifies the life cycle GHG emissions of ethanol produced using corn stover, an agricultural residue. Wide ranging results of 7.9 to 45 gCO2e MJ-1 were initially determined from two fuel life cycle assessment (LCA) tools that modelled corn stover ethanol. Harmonization of model parameters and assumptions in the two LCA tools led to similar estimates of 41 – 42 gCO2e MJ-1 although these values obscured substantial differences in GHG emissions at the individual contributor level, which can impact the fuel’s performance under different regulatory regimes. Next, the thesis conducted an LCA on RJF derived from corn stover or ethanol from corn stover. The LCA modelled Ontario and Québec RJF production using these regions’ corn production data. The study determined life cycle GHG emissions of 3.5 – 5.3 gCO2e MJ-1 for the Fischer-Tropsch jet fuel pathway while the ethanol-to-jet fuel pathway resulted in 28 – 36 gCO2e MJ-1 due to greater inputs in the ethanol production process. Québec benefitted from its low carbon intensity electricity but corn stover yields in Ontario were identified as advantageous. The last two parts of the thesis assessed the life cycle GHG emissions of RJF from canola, camelina, and carinata oilseeds. Respectively, GHG emissions from each oilseed-to-RJF are 16 – 58 gCO2e MJ-1, 53 – 72 gCO2e MJ-1, and 43 – 52 gCO2e MJ-1. Canola RJF values varied due to soil carbon effects from land use and land management changes. The range of results for camelina and carinata RJF are due to using input data from many sources and differences in modelling assumptions. A scenario maximizing camelina or carinata RJF production using Canadian marginal lands is estimated to reduce GHG emissions in aviation by up to 2 million tonnes of CO2e emissions per year in 2050.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207