An Engineered Paper-Based 3D Co-Culture Model of Pancreatic Cancer as a Platform for Systems Tissue Engineering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly form of pancreatic cancer and is projected to be the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Canada this year. With a 5-year survival rate that has barely improved over the last decade, new therapies are sorely needed to treat this disease. PDAC tumours are characterized by a stroma-rich and hypoxic tumour microenvironment (TME) that drives disease progression and results in a highly aggressive disease. Furthermore, the spatial configuration of cells in the TME affects cell phenotypes, which contributes to the clinical challenge of tumour heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance. Yet, pre-clinical studies typically rely on growing cancer cells deprived of their native complex and heterogeneous TME. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are emerging as powerful tools to model cancer, but their self-assembling nature and lack of stromal cells results in microenvironments that are not controllable, nor physiological. The principles of tissue engineering provide a powerful toolbox to elevate PDO cultures to better mimic the complex TME of PDAC. In this work, I present a versatile engineered 3D in vitro stroma-cancer co-culture model of PDAC based on the Tissue Roll for Analysis of Cellular Environment and Response (TRACER). By leveraging patterned polymer infiltration to reduce the number of cells required for TRACER, we incorporate human PDOs into our system. PDOs establish oxygen gradients across TRACER and in response exhibit graded cell viability, proliferation, hypoxia-response gene expression, and response to chemotherapy. We then incorporate primary pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) to produce co-culture tissues with user-defined architectures that were inferred from clinical PDAC samples. By performing high dimensional characterization using CyTOF, we demonstrate that tissue architecture leads to distinct hypoxia and proliferation gradients. Furthermore, phenotypic markers for both cell types are also graded in ways that cannot be explained by either hypoxia or co-culture alone. I anticipate that our engineered tissue model will enable systems biology studies not possible with classic in vitro models. Specifically, our model will help decipher how tissue architecture and cell interactions regulate cell phenotype and, in turn, tissue-scale phenotypes that can be targeted for therapeutic purposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".