MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133042738

Facilitating Discovery in Open Data Repositories

2024· dissertation· W7133042738 on OpenAlexaff
Christina of Christodoulakis

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicData Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataData elementMetadata repositoryDiscoverabilityMetadata modelingOpen dataLinked dataSchema (genetic algorithms)Data mapping
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Governments and industry are increasingly recognizing the potential benefits of publicly available data for social, scientific, and business innovation. The growth of data on public platforms has made data discoverability challenging. This is exacerbated by inconsistent adherence to data publishing standards. Comma-Separated Values (CSV) is a prevalent Open Data format used in various domains for its straightforwardness. Yet, CSV data often lacks strict specification compliance, complicating automated discovery and extraction. Our work introduces two novel methods to enhance Open Data metadata for improved data discovery. The first, Pytheas, automates the discovery of topological structural metadata in CSV files — identifying table locations and elements by leveraging column value coherency. We evaluated Pytheas over two manually annotated data sets totaling 4511 CSV files sourced from portals in four English-speaking countries. We show that Pytheas compares favorably to state-of-the-art approaches in accuracy and generalizability. Finally, we introduce a confidence measure for table discovery and demonstrate its value in error identification. The second method, Gnomon, focuses on the unification of semantics metadata of table attributes found in supplementary documentation files in Open CSV. We propose a metadata model for capturing common table attribute semantics, and use a two-step unification approach: an ensemble of classifiers to discern schema matching between a source schema and the target metadata model, followed by a Weighted Bipartite b-Matching (WBbM) step to enforce domain constraints. Evaluating Gnomon on 228 files from English-speaking government and scientific Open Data portals showed that it outperforms current schema matching techniques, with WBbM proving effective in the alignment task. We anticipate that these approaches will empower researchers and industry professionals across a wide spectrum of domains, highlighting their potential to advance the landscape of data science and collaboration

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.039
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.160
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0390.160
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0160.015
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0130.025
Open science0.0060.023
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.325
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicData Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207