MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133045974

Continuity in primary care and its impact on investments in health capital. an application and extension of the grossman model of the demand for health

2002· dissertation· W7133045974 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Julie Arnold Gilbert

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2002
Typedissertation
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth CanadaInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
KeywordsAmbulatory careHealth careGrossmanContinuity of carePrimary carePopulationHealth economicsStock (firearms)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines continuity in primary care within the framework of an economic model of health. Grossman's Model of the Demand for Health explores how individual factors such as education affect the efficiency in the production of health investments and the resulting addition to one's stock of health. This thesis posits that continuity of care also increases the efficiency of investments in health and uses this theoretical framework to look at continuity of care and its impact on the demand for health. The main objectives of this study were to: determine what individual patient characteristics are associated with continuity of care; assess the relationship between continuity of care and health status; assess the relationship between continuity in primary care and ambulatory care utilization; and study the effect of the presence of a chronic condition. The study used data from the 1994 National Population Health Survey and linked it ambulatory care and hospitalization data. Continuity was measured by Bice and Boxerman's COC index. The analyses included multivariate regression to model continuity of care with individual-level variables and ambulatory care utilization. Stratification on the basis of whether or not a patient had a chronic condition was also used to look at the effect of this variable on the relationship in question. A strong relationship was found between continuity in primary care and patient age, retirement and income. Increasing continuity was associated with decreasing rates of medical hospitalizations, indicating a possible relationship between continuity and health. A negative association was found between continuity in primary care and the number of visits made per patient. This relationship was not affected by individuals' chronic disease status. Expenditures appeared to be unrelated to continuity of care, except among patients with chronic conditions, where the relationship was found to be negative. This study demonstrated an association between continuity of care and the demand for medical care. These findings support the hypothesis that with greater continuity, patients realize greater returns on the investments in their health capital. As a result, they derive more health benefits and experience a reduced demand for health and for further health care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes→French-language works237,207→