Computational Evaluation of a Hybrid Electrochemical Reduction-bioproduction System for the Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Fuels and Chemicals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrochemical reduction of CO2 (eCO2R) can produce a number of one and two carbon (C1/C2) compounds that can serve as sustainable feedstocks for bioproduction processes. The presented research seeks to optimize the integration of these two technologies by evaluating a wide range of eCO2R product-bioproduct pairs. Specifically, the costs of production of the eCO2R system were evaluated for eight C1/C2 eCO2R products, and these costs were combined with metabolic modeling predictions to investigate the most economically feasible pairs when considering more than 1000 bioproduction options (20+ assimilation pathways and 50+ bioproducts). The results suggest that the aerobic bioconversion of C2 products or methanol to highly oxidized products provide the most economically viable option, followed by the anaerobic bioconversion of formate/hydrogen or carbon monoxide/hydrogen to more reduced products. Overall, this analysis highlights areas of interest for future studies, particularly when selecting substrate-product combinations on which to focus experimental efforts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".