MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133048941

Association Between Early Life Exposure to Phthalates and Organophosphate Esters and the Development of Childhood Asthma and Wheeze

2021· dissertation· W7133048941 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Garthika Navaranjan

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWheezeAsthmaPhthalateQuartileRespiratory soundsCohortEpidemiologyCohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma is the most common chronic disease among children. Children spend most of their early life indoors, exposed to chemicals used in consumer and building products, which may present a risk to asthma development, including phthalates, used as plasticizers, and organophosphate esters (OPEs), used as flame retardants and plasticizers. Few epidemiological studies have examined early life exposure to these chemicals and the development of childhood asthma, as well as the interplay with genetics, which was examined by this dissertation using data from the Canadian CHILD Cohort Study. Using urine samples from 1,578 children collected across early life and 726 house dust samples collected at 3-4 months, I found that Canadian children have ubiquitous early life exposure to phthalates and OPEs. I found higher phthalate metabolite concentrations among children in lower income families. OPE concentrations were higher in dust collected here compared to other studies, possibly due to sampling of the child’s sleeping environment that contains sources of OPEs and phthalates. Using a case-cohort study, I examined the association between early life exposure to phthalates and OPEs, measured in house dust samples collected at 3-4 months, and the development of asthma at 5 years and recurrent wheeze between 2 to 5 years. I found a four-fold increased risk of asthma associated with the highest concentration quartile of di(2-ethyl-hexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and a two-fold increased risk of recurrent wheeze across all quartiles of DEHP compared to the lowest quartile. For OPEs, I observed a two to four-fold increased risk of asthma diagnosis across quartiles of tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate exposure compared to the lowest quartile. Using a Genetic Risk Score (GRS) combining multiple genetic loci, I examined whether genetics modifies the association between early life phthalate exposure and the risk of childhood asthma and recurrent wheeze. The GRS did not modify the association with childhood asthma or recurrent wheeze. These results highlight the need to reduce exposure to phthalates and OPEs during early life, especially the first year of life, and the importance of exposures among low-income populations and within the sleeping microenvironment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals→French-language works237,207→