MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133049922

Focal Irradiation Regulates Distal Neural Stem and Progenitor Cell Behaviour

2025· dissertation· W7133049922 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Julia Handfield

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPlexxikon
KeywordsNeural stem cellSubventricular zoneNeuroblastDentate gyrusMicrogliaForebrainSpinal cordProgenitor cell
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neural stem cells (NSCs) are located along the neuraxis of the adult central nervous system: in the dentate gyrus and subventricular zone (SVZ) of the forebrain as well as the periventricular zone of the spinal cord. Cranial irradiation (IR), a common cancer treatment, leads to fewer brain NSCs and impaired neurogenesis. Herein, we investigated how focal IR impacts distal, non-irradiated NSC niches, termed the “long-distance effect”. We demonstrated that focal cranial IR reduced the numbers of spinal cord derived NSCs at 2 days post-IR. Reciprocally, spinal cord IR led to fewer NSCs and depleted neuroblast pools in the forebrain. Since microglia activation is associated with impaired neurogenesis, we hypothesized that microglia ablation would rescue the IR-mediated effects on forebrain neurogenesis. However, microglia ablation paradigms did not reverse the neural stem and progenitor cell loss. Hence, focal IR alters NSC behaviour along the neuraxis, in the presence or absence of microglia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms→French-language works237,207→