Considering Process: Investigating Practice and Methodology in Filipinx Canadian Theatre Creation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considering Process: Investigating Practice and Methodology in Filipinx Canadian Theatre Creation explores the pre-colonial Filipinx concept of pagkikipagkapwa—being ultimately connected to one another and the world around us—in the processes of Filipinx Canadian artists. Through interviews with research partners, we observe the concept of pagkikipagkapwa in action as it highlights collaboration and joy in the creation of theatre making. Beginning with a brief explanation of pagkikipagkapwa, this project guides readers to find pagkikipagkapwa in the directorial process of Nina Lee Aquino, the collaborative writing processes of Miss Orient(ed), People Power, Through the Bamboo, and Pedestal Pinays, as well as the individual writing processes of Marie Beath Badian, Marie-Leofeli Barlizo, and Leon Aureus. As witnesses to these methodologies, this thesis calls us to consider the present-day processes of racialized artists as adaptations of an ancestral understanding of art making. These processes reflect a pre-colonial understanding of theatre and performance, which ultimately serves as invaluable knowledge in the creation of culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.029 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.056 | 0.060 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".