MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133052102

Automated Reasoning For Uncertain Markov Processes

2025· dissertation· W7133052102 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Muhammad Maaz

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMarkov chainProbabilistic logicMarkov processMarkov decision processMarkov modelEmbeddingRange (aeronautics)Bilinear interpolationSet (abstract data type)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Markov processes are a ubiquitous modeling tool used to model a variety of probabilistic phenomena across a range of disciplines. In this thesis, we develop algorithms for studying Markov processes using tools from the field of automated reasoning. First, we tackle a variant of sensitivity analysis, where we want to obtain all possible parameters for a Markov process such that the total reward achieves a fixed threshold. The set of such parameters forms a semialgebraic set, and so we use cylindrical algebraic decomposition, an algorithm developed for the existential theory of the reals, to describe this set. By exploiting properties of our polynomial system, we develop a variant that runs in singly exponential time, instead of the doubly exponential complexity in the general case. Next, we study properties of Markov processes where the parameters are functions, given as machine learning models, of exogenous variables. Using ideas from formal verification of machine learning models and probabilistic model checking, we show how to obtain guaranteed bounds on the behavior of such processes. For a wide selection of machine learning models, we show that obtaining such guarantees is equivalent to solving a bilinear program, which are classically NP-hard problems. We develop a special decomposition algorithm that solves the bilinear program orders-of-magnitude faster than state-of-the-art solvers. Our algorithmic developments are implemented in two software packages: markovag, which implements our variant of cylindrical algebraic decomposition; and markovml, which provides a domain-specific language for constructing Markov processes, embedding pretrained machine learning models, and then solving the resulting bilinear program with our decomposition scheme. Lastly, we perform a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis using data from nearly 25,000 real cardiac arrests in Ontario, Canada. Using drones to deliver defibrillators to the site of cardiac arrests has been trialled, but a cost-effectiveness analysis has been lacking. Our detailed analysis shows that drones are a cost-effective solution, and our findings are robust to modeling assumptions. The richness of this analysis makes it a fertile case study for our novel algorithms, and we show how our techniques provide deeper insights than usual cost-effectiveness methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicFormal Methods in VerificationFrench-language works237,207