Diastereoselective palladium-catalyzed formate reduction of allylic carbonates as a route to polypropionate systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diastereoselective palladium-catalyzed formate reduction of allylic carbonates presents unique opportunities for applications in target-oriented organic synthesis provided that selectivity, in particular stereoselectivity, in the course of this metal-catalyzed reaction can be controlled. This thesis describes our recent developments on new and efficient metal-catalyzed processes exploiting existing stereocentres on the substrates as a means to control stereoselectivity en route to preparing propionate units containing an array of stereochemical patterns. In particular, the effect of the protecting group, the stereochemistry of the aldol adduct, neighbouring substituents, and the olefin geometry were examined. Appropriate choice of the above parameters provides entry into three of the four possible diastereomeric triads, namely syn-syn, anti-syn, and anti-anti. Preliminary results indicate that construction of the syn-anti triad is possible, albeit in low diastereoselectivity. This thesis is a summary of the research conducted since September 2002 at the University of Toronto under the supervision of Professor Mark Lautens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".