MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133061005

Investigating the Role of Mitochondrial Metabolism in Human Kidney Development and Maldevelopment

2024· dissertation· W7133061005 on OpenAlexafffund
Caoimhe Costigan

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsMaldevelopmentKidneyNephronKidney developmentKidney diseaseContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kidney maldevelopment is a major cause of chronic kidney disease in children. We have limited understanding of the pathogenesis of kidney maldevelopment and there are no specific treatments. Metabolism is important in the pathogenesis of other types of acquired kidney disease, yet little is known about its role in maldevelopment. It is known that as nephron progenitor cells differentiate into mature epithelial nephrons, a metabolic transition from glycolytic to mitochondrial predominance is seen. This has been demonstrated in murine models, and in human tissue at a transcriptomic and metabolomic level. I have leveraged human kidney organoids as a model to add live functional analysis of metabolism in a human developmental context and have demonstrated that at the time points assessed, mitochondrial metabolism predominates. I have also generated a patient-specific kidney organoid model of HNF1β-related kidney maldevelopment in which to interrogate the role of mitochondrial metabolism in the context of kidney maldevelopment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207