MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133061775

Propuesta de procedimiento para una alteración mayor basada en certificado tipo suplementario (STC) SA00863SE en la Aeronave Piper Cheyenne II

2020· dissertation· es· W7133061775 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Institucional FULL · 2020
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCheyennePower (physics)PiperClass (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El Piper Cheyenne II PA-31T es un avión bimotor construido por Piper Aircraft, Es una aeronave pequeña diseñada para 6 pasajeros, cuenta con motores Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-28. Este proyecto está enfocado en realizar una propuesta de procedimiento para llevar a cabo la orden de ingeniería para alteración mayor, suministrando las instrucciones necesarias para modificar la aeronave, basado en la documentación técnica y las instrucciones del Certificado Tipo Suplementario - STC SA00863SE. Obteniendo como resultado, la remoción de los motores PT6A-28, correspondiente a la modificación mayor de la aeronave Piper Cheyenne II PA-31T, instalando motores PT6A-135A Pratt & Whitney y hélices Hartzell HC-E4N3N/D8990SB. De esta forma, es mejorado el rendimiento de la aeronave y la disminución de consumo de combustible. (apartes del texto)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it