MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133070011

Evaluating the Energy Consumption of Battery Electric Vehicles Under a Diverse and Changing Climate

2021· dissertation· W7133070011 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Daniel Bonomo Henrique

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMitacsUniversity of TorontoGovernment of OntarioCompute CanadaNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGreenhouse gasBattery electric vehicleClimate changeElectricityEnergy consumptionFossil fuelGlobal warmingBattery (electricity)Consumption (sociology)Internal combustion engine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passenger vehicles contribute considerably to global energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are one form of climate change mitigation through their higher efficiency compared to internal combustion engine vehicles as well as their use of electricity, which has potential to be less carbon intensive than fossil fuels. However, passenger vehicle energy consumption is affected by operating conditions provided by weather and climate variability.This thesis presents a review of known relationships between climate variables and passenger vehicle energy consumption, with an emphasis on BEVs. The impacts of rising global temperatures on passenger vehicle energy consumption in North America is also estimated. Finally, the impacts of BEV charging on electricity demand and peak demand were estimated for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area while taking ambient temperature into account. The results illustrate the importance of taking climate and climate change into account when conducting BEV impact analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicVehicle emissions and performanceFrench-language works237,207