Intraoral isolation of resin composite biodegration products from human saliva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. Human salivary esterases have been shown to degrade composite resin restoration in vivo. Objective. The aim of this study was to develop rinse solution protocol to recover biodegradation products from composite restorations in vivo. Methods. Cervical composite restorations were placed in patients using adhesive system and composite. Saline mouth rinse with/without 20% ethanol (n=10/group) was collected after a 2 minute rinse protocol immediately and 7 days after restoration placement. Rinse samples were analyzed for biodegradation products using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Saline rinse with 20% ethanol was further used in a 4 and 8 minute (n=10/group) rinse protocol. Results and conclusions. The saline with ethanol rinse solution had greater potential than saline alone to extract a bisGMA composite matrix derived product, bishydroxypropoxyphenylpropane (BisHPPP). The 8 minute rinse protocol showed an increase in BisHPPP levels compared with the 4 minute but not with the 2 minute rinse protocol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".