MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133077451

Word meaning extension in humans and machines

2025· dissertation· W7133077451 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLanguage and cultural evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Word (group theory)Extension (predicate logic)Natural language understandingGenerative grammarRepresentation (politics)Natural languageSet (abstract data type)Chaining
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Words in natural language often take on new meanings, so that language users can express an infinite set of intended meanings with a finite vocabulary. Such processes of word meaning extension (WME) are highly productive, diverse, but also non-arbitrary. However, it remains unclear what common cognitive mechanisms and knowledge are driving various types of word meaning extension. Modeling WME is also relevant for natural language processing (NLP), since novel lexical expressions are constantly emerging through time, and NLP systems should effectively interpret and generate such novel word usages in a human-like way. In this dissertation, I develop a computational framework that not only accounts for word meaning extension in historical language development, but also supports NLP systems to flexibly interpret and generate novel word usages. My dissertation is organized into two main parts. In the first part, I study word meaning extension from a computational cognitive science perspective. I first propose a probabilistic generative model of word meaning extension that relies on multimodal semantic knowledge, and show that the model, when incorporated with the cognitive processes of chaining, can accurately predict historical emergence of novel verb-noun syntactic compositions. Next, I present a novel and general account of semantic chaining through the lens of cognitive efficiency. This account explains different chaining mechanisms as a tradeoff between representation and complexity. I show that the efficiency-based framework can be formulated as an infinite mixture model from Bayesian non-parametric statistics, which adaptively constructs word meaning through time under limited computational resources. In the second part of my dissertation, I study how modeling human-like word meaning extension can enhance natural language processing. Specifically, I propose the problem of word sense extension, where a neural language model trained on limited linguistic data is asked to generate novel usages based on previously unseen word senses. I develop a generative framework that combines deep few-shot learning with semantic chaining to capture incremental word sense extension, and I show that this framework can be leveraged to fine-tune and improve word sense disambiguation on rare word senses. Furthermore, I investigate how modeling the systematicity in word meaning extension in combination with language models helps the construction of non-literal word usages like metaphors. I show that learning the analogical similarity between word meanings effectively improves language model systematicity in making both incremental and irregular types of word meaning extension. I therefore suggest that learning systematic word meaning extension benefits language models on multiple tasks pertaining to figurative language understanding. In summary, my dissertation contributes a principled paradigm for modeling the generative processes of word meaning extension, and it opens up future opportunities for human-like automated processing of creative language use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.012
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicLanguage and cultural evolutionFrench-language works237,207