MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133078808

Collective Communication Enabled Transformer Acceleration on Heterogeneous Clusters

2023· dissertation· W7133078808 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu Zhu Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsScalabilityField-programmable gate arrayInterface (matter)Context (archaeology)Flexibility (engineering)AccelerationCluster (spacecraft)Mobile device
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are becoming increasingly popular in data centers because of their ability to accelerate High-Performance Computing (HPC) and Machine Learning (ML) workloads. There has been extensive research on providing efficient tools such as Message Passing Interface (MPI) and ML model libraries that target FPGA platforms to developers and customers, due to the power efficiency, low latency, and flexibility provided by FPGAs. However, in the context of data centers, there could be hundreds or thousands of FPGAs deployed to accelerate one large-scale application, and the scalability of FPGAs is not well-researched in the academic field. In this thesis, we focus on extending the scalability of the Galapagos framework and propose a multi-cluster Galapagos project. We develop a tool, called Cluster Builder, for partitioning large-scale applications into multiple Galapagos clusters. To further increase the efficiency of the communication portion of the workloads, we propose to add one extra layer on top of the current Galapagos Stack, called the Galapagos Messaging Interface (GMI), which provides the necessary collective communication capabilities to the multi-cluster Galapagos framework. We also design an efficient multi-FPGA transformer model and use the Cluster Builder to deploy it on the multi-cluster Galapagos framework. Lastly, we propose a modified Galapagos framework that supports the AMD Versal Adaptive Compute Acceleration Platforms (ACAPs) [1] architecture. Based on the modified Galapagos framework, we estimate the performance of the transformer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207