MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133083517

The isolation, fractionation, and purification of soyasaponins and the evaluation of their colon anti-carcinogenic activity

2004· dissertation· W7133083517 on OpenAlexaff
Debbie Gurfinkel

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytoestrogen effects and research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nutrition SocietyBibliographical Society of Canada
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsAglyconeSapogeninGlycosideSaponinIn vitroTriterpene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saponins are bioactive compounds found in many plant materials, including legumes. The objectives of the present work were to isolate, fractionate, and purify saponins from soybeans, known as soyasaponins; to determine their potential in vitro colon anti-carcinogenic activity; and to establish a structure-activity relationship. The purified soyasaponins were tested for their ability to suppress the growth of HT-29 colon cancer cells. The most potent compounds were the aglycones, soyasapogenol A and B, which demonstrated a dose dependent and statistically significant suppression of cell growth. The glycosides, soyasaponin A 1, soyasaponin A2, soyasaponin I, soyasaponin III, soyasapogenol B monoglucuronide, group B soyasaponins and deacetylated and acetylated group A fractions, on the other hand were largely inactive. These results suggest a structure-activity relationship: the polar glycosides are inactive while the lipophilic sapogenins are bioactive. Furthermore, in vitro fermentation experiments indicated that colonic microflora readily converted the soyasaponins to the aglycone form. These observations, taken together, suggest that the soyasaponins, after alteration by microflora, may be potential chemopreventive agents against colon cancer. To investigate the role of colonic microflora, soyasaponins were incubated under anaerobic conditions with human microflora. The soyasaponins were converted to soyasapogenol A and soyasapogenol B. Because of the absence of commercially available purified soyasaponins, researchers have always had to isolate the soyasaponins themselves, limiting research on their bioactivity. The methods developed here exploited simple and inexpensive technologies, hopefully encouraging more research interest. Isolation of soyasaponins was achieved using precipitation with ammonium sulphate, solid phase extraction and reverse phase low pressure liquid chromatography. Toxic solvents typically used in saponin chemistry, chloroform, acetonitrile and butanol, were avoided and instead ethanol, methanol and acetone were used. An analytical method named direct densitometry was developed, validated, and used, along with thin layer chromatography to routinely quantitate and evaluate the purity of isolated soyasaponins. Four soyasaponin mixtures, free of non-saponin contaminants were isolated: acetylated and deacetylated group A soyasaponins, group B soyasaponins, and a soyasaponin A2-rich fraction. Six soyasaponins, purified to greater than 80% one compound, were isolated: soyasaponin A 1, soyasaponin I, soyasaponin III, soyasapogenol B monoglucuronide, soyasapogenol A and soyasapogenol B. The identity of each of these fractions was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicPhytoestrogen effects and researchFrench-language works237,207