Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis presents a systematic comparison of the power-supply induced jitter (PSIJ), random jitter (RJ) generation and random jitter amplification (RJA) of different CMOS tunable-delay clock buffers in GF 45-nm PDSOI technology. Under the proposed com- parison methodology, inductive peaking buffer architectures using passive and active inductors were found to have the best jitter performance. Passive inductors require large areas at moderate clock frequencies and thus are impractical for most applications. A novel active inductive peaking buffer architecture is proposed as an alternative, improving upon the state-of-the-art by reducing the self-loading effect and improving jitter atten- uation. The clocks of two different digitally-controlled delay lines (DCDL) using shunt capacitor buffers and the proposed active inductive peaking buffers were used at the final multiplexer stage of a prototype 25 Gb/s NRZ transmitter. The resulting post-layout simulated transmitter output jitter shows a 30% reduction using the proposed active inductive peaking buffer design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".