MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133090642

Teacher Perspectives on Refugee Youth Education in Ontario: The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on School Engagement and Barriers to Education

2022· dissertation· W7133090642 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kunio Hessel

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Canadian institutionsEmployment and Social Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeThematic analysisPandemicFace (sociological concept)LiteracyQualitative research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Refugee youth arrive in Canada with gaps in their education and a lack of English language abilities. English Literacy Development (ELD) programs are designed to help refugee high school students close these gaps and provide direct instruction in reading, writing, and oral language. Refugee youth are also at considerable risk for school disengagement, and they have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 school disruptions (Gallagher-Mackey et al., 2021). The present study uses thematic analysis based on teacher interviews to investigate refugee school engagement, barriers to education, and schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to teachers, refugee high school students face numerous barriers to their education including a lack of school skills and difficult home environments which negatively impact their school engagement, and which were exacerbated during emergency online learning. Findings from the present study will add to existing literature and serve as a foundation for future research in this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0250.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesFrench-language works237,207