MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133093874

Flow Characterization of Jammed Microgels in Straight and Bifurcating Microfluidic Channels in Bioprinting Devices

2021· dissertation· W7133093874 on OpenAlexaff
Qiushi Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBifurcationFlow (mathematics)MicrofluidicsViscosityChannel (broadcasting)Open-channel flowSurface finishFlow conditionsPotential flow
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jammed microgels have important implications in bioprinting applications. Characterizing flow of jammed microgels within confined channel is important to understand the flow behavior under different conditions and identify potential sources affecting uniform deposition. Using microfluidic-based channels and PIV approach, the velocity profile in the straight and single-level bifurcation channels are measured under different conditions. Velocity profile of jammed microgels in straight channel is impacted by wall roughness and the viscosity of the continuous phase solution, and in bifurcating branches, it is asymmetrical with a velocity gradient near the inner wall. Near bifurcation junction, the velocity profile shows a peak-valley-peak pattern which implies the presence of a stagnation zone. In addition, the volume fraction of microgels is studied to determine its consistency. From these experiments, the potential sources for non-uniform distribution through bifurcating channels can be identified, thus establishing the groundwork in developing a design rule for bifurcating distribution systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207