MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133095409

Distribution of Cokernels of (n+u) × n Matrices Over Zp and Expected Number of Fields Using Local Mass Formulas

2022· dissertation· W7133095409 on OpenAlexaff
Ling-Sang Tse

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Distribution (mathematics)Abelian groupExpected valueProbability distributionDiscriminantSquare (algebra)Finite fieldField (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the first part of the thesis, let n and u be nonnegative, Mn be (n+u) x n matrices over Zp, and G be a finite abelian p-group. We find that the probability that the p-torsion of the cokernel of Mn is isomorphic to G, as n goes to infinity, is equal to the Cohen and Lenstra measure mu u of G. In the second part of the thesis, using Bhargava's heuristics and local mass formulas, we compute the expected number of cubic and sextic fields using discriminant square classes, as well as the expected number of number fields ordered by conductor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207