MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133101443

Certain Cases of Hikita-Nakajima conjecture

2023· dissertation· W7133101443 on OpenAlexaff
Pavel Shlykov

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsomorphism (crystallography)ConjectureQuiverIndecomposable moduleVariety (cybernetics)Center (category theory)Spectrum (functional analysis)Affine variety
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $\mathfrak{M}_0$ be an affine Nakajima quiver variety, and $\mathcal{M}$ is the corresponding BFN Coulomb branch. Assume that $\mathfrak{M}_0$ can be resolved by the (smooth) Nakajima quiver variety $\mathfrak{M}$. The Hikita-Nakajima conjecture claims that there should be an isomorphism of (graded) algebras $H^*_{S}(\mathfrak{M},\mathbb{C}) \simeq \mathbb{C}[\mathcal{M}_{\mathfrak{s}}^{\mathbb{C}^\times}]$, where $S \curvearrowright \mathfrak{M}_0$ is a torus acting on $\mathfrak{M}_0$ preserving the Poisson structure, $\mathcal{M}_{\mathfrak{s}}$ is the (Poisson) deformation of $\mathcal{M}$ over $\mathfrak{s}=\on{Lie}S$, $\mathbb{C}^\times$ is a generic one-dimensional torus acting on $\mathcal{M}$, and $\mathbb{C}[\mathcal{M}_{\mathfrak{s}}^{\mathbb{C}^\times}]$ is the algebra of schematic $\mathbb{C}^\times$-fixed points of $\mathcal{M}_{\mathfrak{s}}$. In this thesis we prove the Hikita-Nakajima conjecture for $\mathfrak{M}= \widetilde{\C^2/ \Gamma}$ (Kleinian singularities) and $\mathfrak{M}=\mathfrak{M}(n,r)$ Gieseker variety ($ADHM$ space). In the latter case we produce the isomorphism explicitly on generators. We also describe the Hikita-Nakajima isomorphism above using the realization of $\mathcal{M}_{\mathfrak{s}}$ as the spectrum of the center of the rational Cherednik algebra corresponding to $S_n \ltimes (\mathbb{Z}/r\mathbb{Z})^n$ and identify all the algebras that appear in the isomorphism with the center of the degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207