MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133102348

Ultrasound-targeted microRNA-26a Therapy for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

2019· dissertation· W7133102348 on OpenAlexaff
Lina A. Elfaki

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2019
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtracellular matrixSmooth muscleAbdominal aortic aneurysmAbdominal aortaAortaAortic aneurysmInflammationVascular smooth muscleExtracellular
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) affect ~5% of adults and are characterized by vessel inflammation, aortic smooth muscle cell (haSMC) depletion and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. microRNA-26a (miR-26a) regulates haSMC function but is reduced in human AAA. We induced targeted delivery of miR-26a or scrambled-control miR to the infrarenal aorta of a clinically relevant rat AAA model using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD). An additional control group received no therapy. In-vitro, haSMCs were stimulated with the inflammatory interleukin-1β (IL-1β; 20ng/ml) and transfected with miR-26a, antimiR-26a and scrambled-control miR. In-vivo, UTMD of miR-26a downregulated inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6 and TGF-β) and elastolytic enzymes (MMP-2 and MMP-9), leading to reduced ECM degradation and AAA dilation. In-vitro, miR-26a downregulated TGF-β signaling (SMAD1 and SMAD4) and differentiation markers (ACTA2 and TAGLN) but enhanced haSMC proliferation, which alludes to a phenotypic switch towards greater haSMC survival. Thus, this study demonstrates a promising miRNA-based UTMD therapy for AAA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicAortic aneurysm repair treatments→French-language works237,207→