Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cleaners have been reported to have increased risk for work-related asthma symptoms (WRAS). This study examines whether cleaners have more WRAS compared to other building workers (OBW) and if this can be attributed to frequency of task performances. School board and racetrack workers in Ontario, Canada completed a questionnaire to establish the prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma (PDA), new-onset asthma (NOA), respiratory symptoms, and WRAS. Among both genders cleaners and OBW had a similar prevalence of PDA, NOA, respiratory symptoms, and WRAS. Female cleaners reported significantly more WRAS. Male cleaners who waxed, and wax stripped floors, spot cleaned carpets, and cleaned tile and grout with a high frequency, reported more WRAS. Time spent performing these tasks was associated with WRAS when they took 4 or more hours. MSDSs for the cleaning chemicals indicate that agents associated with asthma were present suggesting a relationship between task performance and WRAS among male cleaners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".