MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133112419

Machine Learning-Assisted Computational Exploration of High Entropy Materials for Hydrogen Energy

2023· dissertation· W7133112419 on OpenAlexafffund
Ethan Abraham Halpren

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsHydrogenHigh entropy alloysBayesian optimizationAlloyStability (learning theory)HydrideHydrogen storageEntropy (arrow of time)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen fuel can be generated cleanly and used to store and transport energy. Challenges remain regarding the generation and storage of hydrogen, wherein low-cost materials with superior performance represent the final frontier towards ubiquitous adoption of this technology. Multi-principal element materials provide unlimited opportunity for tuning material properties to achieve desired performance goals. This thesis leverages density functional theory simulations and machine learning to both investigate previously synthesized materials and search for new, optimal compositions. Mechanisms of the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions were studied by analyzing the stability of intermediates on the active sites. Strategies for exploiting the varying local chemical environments within high-entropy surfaces are presented. Bayesian optimization was applied towards the accelerated discovery of high entropy alloys for hydrogen storage. Fundamental understanding of metal hydride stability was uncovered, and new alloy compositions were proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207