MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133269886

Important habitats of the North Atlantic Right Whale (Eubalaena glacialis) in Eastern Canadian Waters

2025· other· en· W7133269886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephanie Ratelle, Angelia S. M. Vanderlaan, Elizabeth D. Thompson, Kevin A. Sorochan, Olivia M. Pisano, Adèle C. Labbé

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitatForagingPredationRight whaleCritical habitatPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes in North Atlantic right whale (NARW; Eubalaena glacialis) demography, population dynamics, and distribution, beginning in 2010, highlighted the need for an updated assessment of important habitat in Canadian waters to support their recovery and survival. NARWs rely on a variety of eastern Canadian habitats for foraging, rearing, socializing, mating, and migration. NARWs depend on specific habitat features and attributes vital for these functions, and destruction of the habitat can negatively impact their survival and recovery. A key driver of NARW habitat use in Canadian waters is prey availability and the formation of dense prey aggregations, which are influenced by biophysical processes. NARWs also require unimpeded space and connectivity among habitats to move within and between them. In eastern Canada, NARW sightings occur year-round, with the exception of March, and NARW upcalls are detected through acoustic monitoring efforts in all months, though infrequently from December through March. Directed prey research in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence indicates persistent and suitable foraging conditions supported by local environmental, oceanographic, and bathymetric conditions. Various data sources including NARW sightings, acoustic detections, persistence of predicted foraging habitat based on prey modeling, and a probability of occurrence model, were used to identify important habitats for NARWs in eastern Canadian waters, as well as to describe their functions, features and attributes. The resulting important habitat for feeding, reproduction, rearing, socializing and socialization is comprised of the southern and northwestern Gulf of St. Lawrence, including the Jacques-Cartier Strait and entrance to Chaleur Bay; the Scotian Shelf, especially Emerald and Roseway Basins; the Bay of Fundy; and the Canadian portions of Georges Bank and the Gulf of Maine. The important habitat also includes corridors for migratory movements and habitat connectivity, namely, the Laurentian Channel, Cabot Strait, and the eastern portion of the Scotian Shelf. Additionally, potential foraging areas were identified in coastal waters of the eastern Scotian Shelf and around Newfoundland, at the southern and eastern edges of the Grand Banks, the Flemish Cap, and in the northeast portion of the Jacques Cartier Strait. Many threats may impact NARW habitat. Commonly occurring anthropogenic activities that could potentially destroy NARW habitat include fishing activities, vessel traffic in the marine environment, industrial activities, and energy development and production. For each of these activities, the pathways of effects on habitat functions, features, and attributes are described. Disruptions to the environmental features supporting vital functions, whether due to localized circulation changes, anthropogenic activities, or large-scale climate shifts, could lead to the loss or alteration of suitable habitats, potentially impacting NARW distribution, health, and reproduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→