MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133270753

Reference Points for Canadian Eastern Georges Bank Haddock Fisheries

2024· other· en· W7133270753 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsHaddockStock (firearms)Stock assessmentProductivityBiomass (ecology)Fisheries management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) on eastern Georges Bank (EGB) is a Canada/United States transboundary species and is assessed by the Transboundary Resource Assessment Committee (TRAC). For Canadian domestic fishery management, biomass reference points are required to implement DFO’s fishery decision-making framework incorporating the precautionary approach. A new statistical catch-at-age model was developed for EGB Haddock in 2022; therefore, it was necessary to provide updated advice and recommendations on biomass reference points. The productivity relationships for two different time periods (1931–1954, 1969–2020) were examined. The 1969–2020 time series of data was considered the most appropriate for the calculation of reference points due to the absence of evidence of productivity regime shifts and full availability of age composition data. Brecover, defined as the lowest spawning stock biomass (SSB) on record that resulted in sustained recovery to historically high levels, was determined to be the most appropriate candidate limit reference point (LRP) for EGB Haddock. Brecover for EGB Haddock was explicitly defined as the minimum biomass between 1991 and 1996. Using this definition, and the current model outputs, the minimum estimate of SSB occurring in 1993 is the identified LRP for EGB Haddock (8,620 mt). The proposed upper stock reference (USR) was calculated using the “Rago-Razor” method based on spawning stock biomass and recruitment data between 1969 and 2020 and is estimated as 26,732 mt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207