MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133272457

NL Divs 2HJ3KLNOP4R Snow Crab Stock Assessment in 2024

2025· other· en· W7133272457 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsSnowEcosystemBiomass (ecology)Climate changeAbundance (ecology)Fish stockIndex (typography)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Status With status quo removals in 2025, Assessment Divisions (ADs) 3LNO and 3Ps are projected to be in the Healthy Zone of the Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) Snow Crab Precautionary Approach (PA) Framework, while ADs 2HJ and 3K are projected to be in the Cautious Zone. Recent and ongoing data deficiencies result in the exclusion of AD 4R3Pn from the NL Snow Crab PA Framework. Trends The overall exploitable biomass index has increased from historic lows in 2016 to 2018. In 2024, the exploitable biomass index remained near the same level as 2023. There have been declines in the exploitable biomass indices in ADs 3K and 3Ps over the last two years. Overall abundance indices of pre-recruit, small male, and mature female crab have declined and are near the lowest levels observed. The overall pre-recruit abundance index indicates poor recruitment prospects in the next 2–4 years. Fishery Exploitation Rate Indices (ERIs) decreased in most ADs in recent years. However, status quo removals in 2025 would result in ERIs outside the range permitted in the PA Framework in ADs 3K and 3Ps. The ERI is high in AD 4R3Pn. Ecosystem and Climate Change Considerations The warm phase in ocean climate that started around 2020 continues, with warm bottom temperatures and record high sea surface temperature in 2024. Sustained warm ocean conditions are considered unfavorable for Snow Crab productivity. Total ecosystem biomass levels are approaching the post-collapse highs of the 2010s, with increases being driven by groundfish. Fish predation mortality on Snow Crab peaked in the mid-late 2010s and after some decline has been trending upwards since 2020. Current hinder future growth. Short-term predictions of exploitable biomass based on climate variables indicate resource growth may be limited. Stock Advice As per the NL Snow Crab PA Framework and given that ADs 3LNO and 3Ps are in the Healthy Zone, the exploitation rates should not exceed 42%. As per the NL Snow Crab PA Framework and given that ADs 2HJ and 3K are in the Cautious Zone, the exploitation rates should not exceed 35%. While the current overall level of exploitable biomass is generally not a concern, unfavorable ecosystem conditions and low abundances of small Snow Crab indicate that stock productivity is expected to be poor in the near and medium term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→