MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133273575

Quantifying changes in the Distribution of Atlantic Cod and Yellowtail Flounder on Georges Bank

2023· other· en· W7133273575 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David M. Keith, Jessica A.‏ Sameoto, Freya Keyser, Irene Andrushchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundfishFishingDistribution (mathematics)Atlantic codBycatch
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Georges Bank (GB) has historically been one of the world’s most productive fishing grounds. Several formerly abundant groundfish stocks have experienced declines that have resulted in the cessation of directed fisheries. Subsequently, management agencies in both Canada and the United States (U.S.) have implemented various restrictions in an effort to rebuild these stocks; these restrictions include the implementation of closures. Yellowtail Flounder (Limanda ferruginea) and Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) are two groundfish stocks that have substantially declined and the rationale for closures on GB has included the need to protect these stocks. In the U.S., these closures are larger and focus more broadly on rebuilding these and other stocks on GB, while in Canada the closures are smaller and directed towards the protection of these two stocks during spawning. This document presents temporally variable species distribution models for these two stocks using a suite of static environmental covariates and presence-absence information from groundfish trawl surveys in Canada and the U.S. These models indicate that there have been both seasonal and long-term shifts in the distribution of both stocks. Significant predictors of the distribution of both stocks throughout the year were the average Sea Surface Temperature (SST; average from 1997-2008) and depth (Dep), while sediment type (Sed) was also a significant predictor for Yellowtail Flounder. The seasonal distribution of the core area of Atlantic Cod is similar in the late winter and spring, while in the fall the distribution shifts to the edge of the bank. For Yellowtail Flounder, the core area is found in a similar location throughout the year. The distribution of Atlantic Cod differed approximately every five years, while the Yellowtail Flounder distribution differed every three years. These shifts in distribution are not random, with the centre of gravity of the core areas for both stocks shifting to the northeast throughout the study period. Much of this shift is due to the loss of core area from southern and western portions of GB. The shifts in the distributions have resulted in an increase in the proportion of both stocks in Canadian waters throughout the year. During Atlantic Cod spawning there has been a substantial decline in the core area inside the two large closures in the U.S. In recent years, Yellowtail Flounder have predominately straddled the Canada-U.S. border; during spawning, the proportion of core area observed in Closed Area II (U.S.) has steadily increased to almost half of the total core area on GB. In Canada, the closures to protect Atlantic Cod and Yellowtail Flounder during spawning both predominately include core area, but due to their limited size these closures make up only a small proportion of the core area on the Canadian portion of GB. Finally, during spawning, the models for both stocks were successful at capturing the spatial dynamics up to three years into the future. The framework methodology applied here provides novel insights into both seasonal and inter-annual variability in the spatial distributions of these stocks and provides a quantitative evaluation of closures relative to these distributions. Incorporation of the information from approaches such as this into the science advice process, can facilitate improved decision-making for fishery management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada→French-language works237,207→