Scientific Elements of the Northern Gulf of St. Lawrence (NAFO 3Pn4RS) Atlantic Cod Rebuilding Plan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) stock in the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence (NAFO 3Pn4RS) is below its limit reference point. Given the new Fish Stock Provisions that came into force by regulation in April 2022, this means that Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is legally required to develop a rebuilding plan for this stock. A rebuilding plan comprises several elements, many of which are defined or supported by information and analyses provided by DFO’s Science sector. More specifically, it is under the purview of DFO Science to provide scientifically defensible options for a rebuilding target and rebuilding timeline (Tmin), to evaluate the probability of meeting rebuilding objectives and timelines based on different fishery management options proposed, to identify indicators for tracking rebuilding progress and guide decisions for the periodic review of the rebuilding plan. Peer review of these new elements and analyses is an important step in ensuring that they constitute the best science possible based on the available data, resources and timeline for their development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".