MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133277580

Scientific requirements for the rebuilding plan of Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (NAFO Division 4TVn) spring spawning Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus)

2024· other· en· W7133277580 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
François Turcotte, J. L. McDermid

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStock (firearms)HerringFish stockStock assessmentFisheries managementSpring (device)Fishing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spring spawning component of Atlantic Herring (Clupea harengus) in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (NAFO Division 4TVn) is below its limit reference point (LRP) and in the Critical Zone of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Precautionary Approach framework. The new Fish Stocks Provisions and the amended Fisheries Act legally require DFO to develop a rebuilding plan for this stock. Rebuilding plans involve several key requirements, many of which are defined and/or supported by advice from DFO Science Sector. A rebuilding plan comprises several elements that require DFO Science sector advice including: (i) stock status, (ii) causes of stock decline, (iii) rebuilding target and timeline, (iv) additional measurable objectives, (v) likelihood of management measures meeting rebuilding objectives, (vi) how to track rebuilding progress, and (vii) frequency of the periodic review of the rebuilding plan. Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (sGSL) Atlantic Herring spring spawners sources of serious harm include environmentally-driven recruitment failure associated with a regime shift from cold water/high recruitment to warmer water/low recruitment in the early 1990s, a sustained period of low production low biomass since 2004, reduced growth, high natural mortality, and reduced fecundity. A review of the biomass reference points generated a new LRP using the statistical catch at age model; 40%BMSYproxy. Its value is estimated at 55,000 tonnes (t) of spawning stock biomass (SSB). With this LRP, the stock has been below the LRP and in the Critical Zone of the DFO Precautionary Approach framework since 2001 (previously 2002). In addition to the stock having a 75% probability of being at or above the LRP, the rebuilding target should include that the stock must be at or above this level for 2 consecutive years, and population projections must show the stock is likely to continue its positive trajectory under harvest for 2 years after the rebuilt state has been achieved. Projections showed that the stock is unlikely to rebuild to the rebuilding target under prevailing conditions, even in the absence of fishing mortality. The environmental conditions that would allow to reverse the decline in sGSL Atlantic Herring spring spawners are the occurrence of intermediate and high recruitment events. Since 1992 recruitment has been limited due to environmental conditions which are unlikely to improve as climate change continues. Projections showed that at 150 t of annual bycatch, the population SSB in 10 years would be reduced by 1.0%. Additional measurable objectives for the rebuilding plan should include increasing the proportion of older and larger fish. Rebuilding progress will be tracked using the stock assessment models. The periodic review of the rebuilding plan should be set to every 4 years, which corresponds to every other stock assessment. Objectives should be revised and models should be updated if stock productivity or external factors influencing stock dynamics change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207