MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133279503

Utilisation de la surveillance acoustique passive à partir de planeurs pour la détection en temps quasi réel et la gestion dynamique des baleines noires de l'Atlantique Nord (Eubalaena glacialis) dans les zones dynamiques de navigation du chenal Laurentien

2021· other· en· W7133279503 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kimberley T. A. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliderBaleenShoreUnderwater gliderHydrophoneScale (ratio)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this project was to use right whale detections made by the glider to trigger dynamic vessel management in the traffic separation scheme within Dynamic Shipping Zone C (DSZ C). A profiling glider equipped with a hydrophone system was deployed for an 89-day mission from August 16th through November 10th, 2020. The glider reported daily detections of five species of baleen whales that were validated by a trained human analyst before being distributed to Transport Canada. The glider detected right whales in DSZ C on seven survey days. In response to the glider detections, the speed limit was in place in DSZ C for 32.5 days, or 47.8 % of the survey period. On October 23rd, 2020, the glider departed DSZ C and was recovered near the west shore of Cape Breton on 12 November. The false detection rate for right whale detections at the daily scale was 0%, and the false negative rate for this species at the daily scale was 12.5%, which is within normal operating parameters for this system. The mission objectives were successfully fulfilled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207