MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133282891

Atlantic Cod Rebuilding Plan

2024· other· en· W7133282891 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pêches et Océans Canada

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du Canada · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsOverfishingStock (firearms)FishingPopulationFish stockHarm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence Atlantic Cod biomass was stable and relatively high from 1917 to the late 1940s. Biomass declined in the 1950s as catches increased and fishing mortality was high. The 2018 biomass was 2.4% of the 1917 biomass, which is consistent with the scale of depletion found for adjacent Cod stocks. The main source of serious harm to stock productivity and cause of decline was overfishing starting in 1955. High natural mortality associated with predation by Grey seal has prevented the stock from recovering since the fishery moratorium. Other sources of serious harm include a lasting state of low production and low biomass, recruitment overfishing, high natural mortality, a predation-driven Allee effect, low growth and body condition, and a decrease in age at maturity. A review of the spawning stock biomass (SSB) reference points identified a new Limit Reference Point (LRP) of initial 0.25B0. A proposed Upper Stock Reference was 0.8BMSYproxy and a target reference point of BMSYproxy. The stock crossed the LRP into the Critical Zone of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Precautionary Approach framework in 1990. The definition of the rebuilding target, where the stock has a 75% probability of being at or above the LRP, should be amended to include that the stock must be at or above this level for 4 consecutive years and population projections must show the stock is likely to continue its positive trajectory under harvest for 4 years after the rebuilt state has been achieved. Even in the absence of fishing mortality, the SSB is unlikely to increase to the rebuilding target under prevailing conditions or under various stock projections using natural mortality and recruitment rates consistent with historical levels. At annual removals of 200 tonnes (t) or less, the stock trajectory is indistinguishable from projections under zero fishing. At 300 t, SSB is reduced 10% in 10 years compared to zero fishing; at 500 t, SSB is reduced 16%. The main sources of Cod bycatch are the Atlantic Halibut, Witch Flounder, and Greenland Halibut commercial fisheries, as well as the experimental and index fisheries that target Redfish. Implementing dynamic closures (seasonal and/or annual) of specific areas and fishing depth restrictions reduced species distribution model-predicted bycatch. Bycatch was reduced 18% in the Atlantic Halibut fishery in NAFO 4T, and 14% in the Cod overwintering area in 4Vn, 98% in the NAFO 4T Witch Flounder fishery, and 71% to 87% in the NAFO 4T Greenland Halibut fishery. As the commercial Redfish fishery reopens, bycatch of Atlantic Cod is expected to increase. Implementing an area closure and a minimum fishing depth restriction of 300 m and limiting fishing to June through August reduced predicted bycatch of Cod by at least 56% compared to historical fishing and at least 46% compared to current fishing in NAFO 4T. In NAFO 4Vn, an area closure combined with a minimum latitude limit in winter reduced predicted Cod bycatch by at least 22% compared to historical fishing and at least 14% compared to current fishing. Although a winter (November to April) Redfish fishery had greater potential bycatch compared to a summer (June to August) fishery, the proposed area closures for NAFO 4T and NAFO 4Vn combined with a 300 m minimum fishing depth in NAFO 4T reduced predicted bycatch by at least 96% compared to without these restrictions. Additional measurable objectives of the rebuilding plan include; increase the proportion of larger fish, increase size and condition at length, recover the spatial distribution in shallow waters, and promote recruitment by protecting spawning grounds. Rebuilding progress will be tracked using the stock assessment model. The periodic review of the rebuilding plan should be set to the 4-year stock assessment cycle with an interim update at the halfway point. Objectives should be revised and models should be updated if stock productivity or external factors influencing stock dynamics change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Open Science Repository of Canada / Le Dépôt fédéral de science ouverte du CanadaFrench-language works237,207